Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Yards, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla M, Velez Garcia-Nieto A, Isla-Tejera B
90 days) amongst the history research time and the complete book day. With this particular advice, periodicals should consider requesting people off SRs in order to revise its literature browse before greet of your own SRs. SR pages should decide the time lag within last browse time of your recommendations to make certain that the data is actually up-to-date having productive logical decision-making.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Medical analysis during the healthcare a functional publication. During the. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press,; 2001: 1 online funding (148 p.).
Chalmers We. Part 24: having fun with clinical ratings and you will files out of lingering samples for medical and you may moral demonstration framework, overseeing, and you can reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Health-related analysis inside the medical care : meta-research inside the context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper Nj, Jones DR. Proof synthesis since the the answer to significantly more coherent and you can successful search. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:29.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Is systematic feedback right up-to-day at the time of guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese An excellent, Coletti S, Dante A good. Book results one of many highest effect basis breastfeeding magazines in 2009: good retrospective investigation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Meters, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most systematic product reviews had written in the highest-perception periodicals failed to register the fresh new standards: a good meta-epidemiological research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Meters, Elo S, Kyngas H. The brand new methodological quality of logical recommendations typed within the higher-perception breastfeeding magazines: a glance at the books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Teaching equipment inside the research based habit: review off reusable learning objects (RLOs) to possess discovering meta-research. BMC Med Educ Thai brudekteskapsbyrГҐ. 2011;.
Shea Blowjob, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is a reliable and you will appropriate measurement equipment to assess the methodological quality of scientific analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Meters, Vallve Odena Yards, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic Good, Jeric M, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak M, Poklepovic Pericic T, et al. Methodological and you will reporting top-notch health-related ratings wrote on the high ranks magazines in the area of serious pain. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The quality of systematic recommendations at hand businesses: an analysis having fun with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. A keen AMSTAR investigations of the methodological quality of systematic ratings out-of dental medical care interventions typed regarding log out of used dental technology (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):440eight.
Logical ratings and you may meta-analyses towards psoriasis: part out of financing sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices just like the predictors out-of methodological high quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty-two.
Brandt JS, Downing Air-con, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Pass classics in obstetrics and you can gynecology: brand new 100 most often quoted journal articles within the last fifty years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e17.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Yards, Tam WW, Tang J. Shipments and you may epidemiological features out-of penned individual patient studies meta-analyses. PLoS You to. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Acceptance away from PRISMA declaration and you may quality of scientific reviews and you may meta-analyses wrote in the nursing journals: a combination-sectional data. BMJ Discover. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Cock sucking, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Meters, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai An excellent, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Outside recognition out of a description unit to assess health-related analysis (AMSTAR). PLoS That. 2007;2(12):e1350.
